Applying for the Research Allowance Yourself or With Support?
The FZulG has no consultancy requirement: you can file the BSFZ application and research allowance application (ELSTER) entirely on your own. Realistically plan 40 to 80 working hours for a first application, plus about three months for the BSFZ review.
- No consultancy requirement: both stages are self-filed
- First application realistically 40–80 working hours
- Common rejection reason: weakly substantiated technical risk
Apply yourself or get support
Figures and details
The BSFZ checks these three criteria in every application (§ 2 FZulG). The Wording tab explains each row.
Key facts in brief
Yes, you can apply for the research allowance entirely on your own. The FZulG has no consultancy requirement: the BSFZ certifies the R&D project as the base ruling (§ 6 FZulG), then you file research allowance application (ELSTER) at the tax office after the end of the fiscal year (§ 5 FZulG). The tax office offsets the allowance against the tax liability, and any surplus is paid out (§ 10 FZulG). Realistically plan 40 to 80 internal working hours for a first application, plus about three months for the BSFZ review. What matters is whether novelty, technical risk and a systematic approach are argued convincingly; this is where most DIY applications fail.
The Essentials of the DIY Application
When Does Support Pay Off?
| Eligible Costs | In-House Experts | No In-House Experts |
|---|---|---|
| Under EUR 500,000 in eligible costs | DIY is usually the right choice | DIY manageable with a time investment |
| From EUR 500,000 in eligible costs | DIY remains reasonable | Support pays off almost always |
This is an experience-based rule from NOVARIS, not a legal threshold: from EUR 500,000 in eligible costs, support pays off almost always, unless the company has its own FZulG experts in house. At this scale, the difference in funding clearly outweighs the fee, because a fully used assessment basis brings in more than the saved consulting hours. The fee is also success-based: 70 % is due only after the allowance is paid out.
How much time does the DIY application really take?
More than most people expect. Plan 40 to 80 internal working hours for a first application with one project, spread across six tasks.
Plus an ongoing 1 to 2 hours per week for time tracking, not included in the total.
| Task | Stage | Your Effort |
|---|---|---|
| Delineate R&D projects | Preparation | 8–15 hrs |
| Write the BSFZ project description | Stage 1 (BSFZ) | 15–30 hrs per project |
| Register and submit in the BSFZ portal | Stage 1 (BSFZ) | 2–4 hrs |
| Complete research allowance application (ELSTER) via ELSTER | Stage 2 (tax office) | 4–8 hrs per fiscal year |
| Ongoing time tracking and documentation | Continuous | 1–2 hrs per week |
| Answer queries from BSFZ or tax office | Both stages | 4–10 hrs |
What drives the effort up
- Multiple projects: Each project description is written separately, so effort scales almost linearly.
- First application: The learning curve for BSFZ criteria and the portal hits hardest the first time.
- Retroactive years: Time tracking and documentation have to be reconstructed afterwards.
- Contract research: Contracts need review and the fee must be allocated correctly; 70 % of the fee is eligible (§ 3 (4) FZulG).
What actually separates a DIY application from supported filing?
Both routes lead to the same allowance. The difference lies in time spent, rejection risk and how fully the assessment basis is used.
| Criterion | DIY | With Support |
|---|---|---|
| Time spent | partly 40–80 hrs internal per first application | yes a few interviews, we handle the rest |
| Rejection risk | partly higher without BSFZ routine, above all on the technical risk | yes project descriptions that match BSFZ assessment practice |
| Cost | no fees at the BSFZ or tax office, but 40–80 internal hours | success-based, 70 % due only after payout; no success, no fee |
| Evidence and documentation | partly time tracking, project description and research allowance application (ELSTER) prepared yourself | yes we prepare and align the documents |
| Assessment basis | partly the flat rate and contract research are easily overlooked | yes fully used, funding on average 40 % above the initial calculation |
| Track record | depends on experience and time budget | yes 25 of 25 accompanied BSFZ applications approved (as of 09/2026) |
The funding level does not depend on who files the application: 25 % of the assessment basis, or 35 % for SMEs (§ 4 (1) FZulG). For externally commissioned R&D after 27 March 2024, the allowance before the additional flat rate is 17.5 % or 24.5 % of the fee. The assessment basis is capped at EUR 12 million, so the SME allowance is capped at EUR 4.2 million per year.
What separates a weak project description from a strong one?
Both applications describe the same project. Only one shows the BSFZ where the novelty, technical risk and systematic approach lie.
| Criterion | Weak: only the result | Strong: the route there |
|---|---|---|
| Novelty | “We developed a new piece of software.” | “At the outset it was open whether the chosen architecture would work technically.” |
| Technical risk | “The development was technically demanding.” | “The solution path was uncertain because existing methods demonstrably did not solve the problem.” |
| Systematic approach | “We proceeded step by step.” | “We tested two solution approaches against each other systematically and documented the results.” |
The most common mistake: the application describes what was developed but not why the solution path was technically uncertain. That is exactly what the BSFZ checks, alongside novelty and a systematic approach.
Where do DIY applications fail most often?
These four mistakes repeat most often and cost real money.
| Mistake | Typical Consequence | Fixable Afterwards? |
|---|---|---|
| BSFZ rejection due to a weak project description | Claim for the project lost; appeal or new application costs several months | Partly, appeal and re-application are possible |
| Overhead flat rate not claimed | 20 % of personnel costs missing from the assessment basis, every single year | Yes, as long as the assessment can be amended |
| Contract research allocated incorrectly | Cut by the tax office, or the 70 % of the fee goes unused | Partly, depends on the procedural stage |
| Time tracking missing or started too late | Cuts in a tax audit, in the worst case clawback | Hardly, difficult to fix retroactively |
Which questions come up most often about the DIY application?
Before you start: DIY application or support?
In a free first consultation we assess in 30 minutes whether your project suits a DIY application or where support makes the difference. Success-based, 70 % due only after payout.
Book a first consultationRead on
- Funding programmes comparedResearch allowance, ZIM, KMU-innovativ and EIC side by side
- Applying for the research allowance: step by stepThe complete process from the BSFZ certificate to payout.
- Application exampleA fully written project description that convinces the BSFZ.
- BSFZ portal: guideRegistration and form fields step by step.
- Forms and research allowance application (ELSTER)All forms for both application stages at a glance.
- Time tracking for the research allowanceDocument R&D hours audit-proof.
- Apply retroactivelyWhich tax years are still open and how to use the deadline.
- Research allowance consultingWhat NOVARIS takes over when support pays off.
Max Nodes
Founder and Managing Director of NOVARIS Consulting. Specialised in the German R&D tax credit (FZulG) since 2021; 25 of 25 accompanied BSFZ applications approved (as of 09/2026). Max Nodes