Compare research allowance advisers: the register of 10 providers

Anyone looking for a research allowance adviser finds rankings that nobody substantiates. We built a register instead: 10 providers with what can be verified, namely legal entity, the provider's own self-description, fee model and both procedural stages. And below it the same standards, applied to ourselves.

  • 10 providers, every entry dated and traceable to its source
  • Two filters: group and fee model
  • NOVARIS measures itself against the same standards further down
At a glance

Compare the work behind the advice

Compare the work behind the advice — Scope · fees · evidenceAB
Scope · fees · evidence
Figures and details
Three groups, 10 providers
10providersFZulG specialistsGrant consultanciescovering severalprogrammesSoftware and platformproviders

Grouped by what the providers say about themselves, not by our assessment.

Key facts in brief

There are plenty of rankings of research allowance advisers, and none of them is substantiated. So this register only lists what can be checked: for each of the 10 providers the legal entity, the provider's own self-description, the fee model and whether it covers both procedural stages, meaning the BSFZ application and research allowance application (ELSTER). Every row is dated and traceable to the provider's own source. We deliberately left ourselves out of the list and instead measured ourselves against the same standards below it: NOVARIS since 2026 with 25 of 25 supported BSFZ applications certified (as of 09/2026) and a fee of which 70 % is due only after payout; before founding NOVARIS (2026) over 90 BSFZ applications supported for around 50 companies, on average 40 % more funding than the companies' own first application. What we can do should show in numbers, not in stars. Nationwide figures for all BSFZ applications are in the Forschungszulage Report 2026.

The essentials of the register

  • What gets listed
    Providers with a publicly verifiable self-description on the research allowance
  • Where entries come from
    The provider's own website, with a retrieval date
  • What is missing
    Prices, ratings, success rates, ranking
  • Two filters
    Group and fee model
  • Why we are absent
    Your own register is no place for your own advertising
  • Which providers advise on the research allowance?

    10 providers in three groups. The groups follow what the providers say about themselves, not our assessment.

    Publisher of this register: NOVARIS Consulting GmbH, Munich, itself a provider of research allowance consulting. Our own service is therefore not listed in the table but set out separately on research allowance consulting and in the verifiable figures at the end of this page.
    Group
    Fee model

    Register of research allowance advisers
    ProviderFocusFee model typeBoth procedural stagesSize (self-declared)
    FZulG specialists Providers whose own positioning puts the Research Allowance at the centre, as their focus or their only subject.
    Banhoek Consulting GmbHBanhoek Consulting GmbH, GräfelfingAmtsgericht München, HRB 258813Retrieved: September 1, 2026Research Allowance onlySuccess-based · timing n/aYesn/a
    CF Clever Funding GmbHCF Clever Funding GmbH, KölnAmtsgericht Köln, HRB 98204Retrieved: September 1, 2026Research Allowance focusn/aPartlyn/a
    Grantonomy GmbHGrantonomy GmbH, Monheim am RheinAmtsgericht Düsseldorf, HRB 113939Retrieved: September 1, 2026Research Allowance onlySuccess-based · timing n/aYesn/a
    Seedwise GmbHSeedwise GmbH, Bad BramstedtAmtsgericht Kiel, HRB 27393 KIRetrieved: September 1, 2026Research Allowance onlySuccess-based · timing n/aYesn/a; one location
    Grant consultancies covering several programmes Providers that treat the Research Allowance as one instrument among several, alongside ZIM, EU and regional programmes.
    Ayming Deutschland GmbHAyming Deutschland GmbH, DüsseldorfAmtsgericht Düsseldorf, HRB 56580Retrieved: September 1, 2026Funding + international taxSuccess-based · on approval noticen/aapprox. 70 employees in Germany (self-declared)
    EurA AGEurA AG, EllwangenAmtsgericht Ulm, HRB 728305Retrieved: September 1, 2026Many programmes, internationaln/an/a200+ experts, 14 offices in 4 countries (self-declared)
    Leyton Deutschland GmbHLeyton Deutschland GmbH, DüsseldorfAmtsgericht Düsseldorf, HRB 89458Retrieved: September 1, 2026Many programmes, internationaln/an/a3,000+ employees worldwide, 18 countries, in Germany since 2020 (self-declared)
    Steinbeis Technologie- & Innovationsberatung GmbHSteinbeis Technologie- & Innovationsberatung GmbH, MünchenAmtsgericht München, HRB 291205Retrieved: September 1, 2026Research Allowance + grantsDegressiveYesOwn headcount n/a; reference to the Steinbeis network
    GrantLift GmbHGrantLift GmbH, HamburgAmtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 183538Retrieved: September 2, 2026Broad funding advisorySuccess-based · timing n/aYesn/a; one location
    Software and platform providers Providers offering a documentation or compliance platform, expressly excluding individual advisory from their scope of services.
    innoscripta SEinnoscripta SE, TutzingAmtsgericht München, HRB 302244Retrieved: September 1, 2026Documentation platformn/aNo11 offices, 5 countries (self-declared); headcount n/a

    Entries follow the providers' own verifiable statements. No rating, no ranking, no prices. NOVARIS is not in the register.

    Next review of the register: December 1, 2026.

    The column on both procedural stages says the most: the BSFZ application is technical work, research allowance application (ELSTER) is tax work. A provider covering only one stage leaves you to find someone for the other.

    How can NOVARIS itself be measured?

    The same standards as above, applied to ourselves.

    NOVARIS in verifiable figures
    MetricValueSource
    Approval rate25 of 25 supported BSFZ applications certified · 100 % · as of 09/2026NOVARIS, since 2026
    Funding volume filedEUR 18.85 millionNOVARIS, since 2026
    BSFZ processing time3.5 months on average to the certificateNOVARIS, since 2026
    Fee due dates30 % at approval, 70 % only after payoutOwn fee model
    Tax audit supportSupport during the tax audit includedOwn service commitment
    Experience before NOVARISbefore founding NOVARIS: over 90 BSFZ applications, 50 companies, on average 40 % more funding than the companies' own first applicationMax Nodes, before founding NOVARIS

    These figures come from our own client data and our own fee structure, not from self-assessment: 25 of 25 supported BSFZ applications certified, the BSFZ certificate after 3.5 months on average. Before founding NOVARIS, Max Nodes supported over 90 BSFZ applications for 50 companies, on average 40 % more funding than the companies' own first application, in a leadership role at the largest provider of research allowance consulting in Germany. And the terms: no fee up front, 30 % with the BSFZ certificate, 70 % only once the allowance is in your account. Anyone who bills like this has to deliver, and that is exactly what we do.

    Clarify your requirements before you compare

    In the first consultation we work out which stages you actually need to hand over and what you can keep in house. The table is easier to read afterwards, and you know what an application with us costs: nothing up front.

    Book a first consultation
    Max Nodes

    Max Nodes

    Founder and Managing Director of NOVARIS Consulting. Specialised in the German R&D tax credit (FZulG) since 2021; 25 of 25 accompanied BSFZ applications approved (as of 09/2026). Max Nodes